협업

Psychological safety first: building trust among teams

Employees can benefit from being vulnerable at work, and that comes with knowing it’s OK to take risks and sometimes fail

Slack 팀이 작성2019년 2월 19일Robert Samuel Hanson의 일러스트

How many times have you heard that there’s no room for emotions in the workplace, only clear, decisive action? While it used to be taboo to talk about feelings at work—and in many cases it still is—experts believe that there is a lot to gain from expressing emotions. In fact, not talking about feelings (like doubts and worries) can be downright detrimental to a business.

Researchers Hemant Kakkar and Subra Tangirala note that even people who may be naturally more inclined to raise ideas and offer suggestions may not do so if they fear being put down or punished. “On the flip side, encouraging and rewarding speaking up can help more people do so, even if their personality makes them more risk-averse,” they write.

It might be that employees don’t believe that their opinions matter or that their contributions may be restricted by workplace hierarchies. Front-line managers need to be extra conscientious of employees’ feelings and fears and recognize how these emotions affect motivation and workers’ ability to do their job.

That’s where psychological safety comes in.

Creating a safe space for employees takes work, but fortunately, it doesn’t require a lot of expensive training—just care and consistency.

What is psychological safety, and how does it help your team?

Psychological safety is a shared feeling that it’s OK to be open and honest in a group setting. Amy Edmondson, a Harvard Business School professor who coined the term, describes a psychologically safe workplace culture as “one where people are not full of fear, and not trying to cover their tracks to avoid being embarrassed or pushed.” In other words, the act of speaking up and learning from mistakes is encouraged, even celebrated.

It’s important for leaders to realize, however, that psychological safety isn’t the result of being nice. Quite the opposite, actually. Edmondson says that it’s dependent on there being a certain level of healthy conflict in the workplace. “Psychological safety is about candor, about making it possible for productive disagreement and free exchange of ideas,” she writes in an article for Quartz.

This is something Jake Herway, senior managing adviser at research firm Gallup, can attest to. Herway describes working with an organization that reached a standstill in the middle of an important transition. “It was clear to me that no one in the department felt safe defending or actively pursuing a new idea, an opinion, or a criticism,” he writes. “The environment wasn’t negative … but it was unproductive once real work began.”

When managers and employees inauthentically support each others’ ideas in the name of being polite, they miss out on an opportunity to communicate with and learn from each other. Overly kind statements (especially ones that are incorrect, vague, or directed at the wrong person) actually lead to what Kim Scott, author of Radical Candor, calls “ruinous empathy.” This type of behavior, one that values politeness over progress, may make employees feel good in the short term, but it doesn’t help anyone grow or improve.

Employees who feel engaged and empowered to take action, on the other hand, know that their voices are being heard and that their opinions are valued (and challenged) by the team, which can have a hugely positive impact on a team’s ability to innovate.

How to create psychological safety at work

Saying you encourage your teams to speak up and take risks is one thing, but actually creating a culture of trust is another. This is especially true when you consider how quickly psychological safety can be derailed. One impulsive retort can bring the entire team down.

Ultimately, the manager’s interactions with the group will determine whether team members feel safe airing opinions and concerns. Employees want to work with leaders who see themselves as part of the team and whom they trust to be transparent.

4 ways managers and team leaders can improve psychological safety

  1. Admit you’re wrong. By demonstrating vulnerability and directness, you can show employees that it’s OK to make mistakes (and to acknowledge them with the wider team). In Edmondson’s opinion, it’s even effective for leaders to apologize for not facilitating trust and safety in the past.
  2. Ask for the team’s input. Researchers Alison Reynolds and David Lewis say that hierarchical behavior can stifle experimentation because it puts the onus on an individual, rather than an entire team. By asking employees for their opinions in group settings, they will not only feel more involved and accountable but also empowered to innovate.
  3. Respond positively to questions and doubts. Gallup found that only 30% of U.S. employees think their opinions matter at work. And it’s not just strategic ideas that need to be acknowledged. Managers should show appreciation when employees speak up about unrealistic timelines or ask for clarification on a project. Thank them for voicing their concerns, and then help them decide on next steps.
  4. Forgive employees’ mistakes. Nothing kills psychological safety quicker than a negative reaction to an error. Instead, focus on the positives: A mistake was caught, it can be fixed, and there’s something to learn from the experience. Above all, a psychologically safe environment protects employees from the fear of being wrong.

For Karlyn Borysenko, organizational psychologist and author of Zen Your Work: Create Your Ideal Work Experience Through Mindful Self-Mastery, it all comes down to letting yourself be vulnerable.

“The very best way to get started is by being the role model for your team in regard to what psychological safety looks like,” she writes in an article for Forbes. “And the truth is that if you don’t learn to do these things for yourself, no amount of team-building activities will help you get where you want to be.”

Let’s talk about trust

Similar to Edmondson’s view on the differences between psychological safety and kindness, leaders must also remember that there is a clear distinction between psychological safety and trust. The two concepts are related, but not interchangeable. Rather, trust between colleagues and their leaders contributes to this safety, and vice versa.

A psychologically safe work environment establishes a constant, collaborative state that’s stable despite fluctuations in pace or workload. And when teams feel safe, they’ll be more empowered to face challenges. Your org chart is full of potential—you just need to give your people a safe space to reach it.

 

이 포스트가 유용했나요?

0/600

훌륭해요!

피드백을 주셔서 감사합니다.

알겠습니다!

피드백을 주셔서 감사합니다.

죄송합니다. 문제가 발생했습니다. 나중에 다시 시도해주세요.

계속 읽기

새 소식

시간 외 근무와 생산성 저하 사이의 놀라운 연관성

Slack의 인력 지수는 직원의 생산성, 웰빙, 만족도를 극대화하기 위해 근무 시간을 구성하는 방법에 대한 새로운 결과를 보여줍니다.

생산성

수사관부터 순회 외판원까지, 업무를 진행하는 페르소나와의 만남

전 세계 15,000명의 사무직 직원을 대상으로 고유한 페르소나와 선호하는 커뮤니케이션 방식, 그리고 첨단 기술을 바라보는 관점을 파악하기 위한 설문 조사를 실시했습니다.

생산성

Salesforce 영업 리더가 Slack을 사용해 신뢰를 쌓고 생산성을 높인 3가지 방법

엔터프라이즈 기업이 AI와 자동화를 통해 보다 심도 있는 연결을 형성한 방법을 자세히 알아보세요.

협업

미소를 넘어 직장에서의 이모티콘 사용은 어떻게 발전되어 왔을까

이모티콘의 현황을 이해하기 위해 전 세계 9,400명의 하이브리드 형태의 근로자를 대상으로 설문 조사를 실시했습니다.